Insights & Media
Report

Screening the globe for small and mid-caps

June 2020
Livewire Markets

Screening the globe for small and mid-caps

June 2020

Highlights from global small and mid-cap perspectives with CIO Ned Bell and Livewire Markets. 

What is the trend, theme, or piece of data that is most important for investors to watch as the world moves out of lockdown? Why?

The two most important data points to watch would be U.S. unemployment and earnings revisions for 2020 and 2021 for the MSCI World Index.

Perhaps more than anything, the COVID-19 crisis has been a ‘consumer recession’. Not only have consumers been in varying degrees of lockdown – and therefore not been in a position to spend – but the economic hit has been massive and resulted in ~38 million people in the U.S. losing their jobs in a very short period of time.

One of the biggest unknowns at this point is around the re-opening of the economy. If the states re-open too quickly, there is obviously a risk that we see a second wave of COVID-19 and head back into lockdown. This scenario clearly isn’t priced into markets at the moment and if anything, they are pricing in a seamless reopening.

As far as earnings estimates are concerned, we have seen the current year EPS estimates for the MSCI World Index downgraded by 33% YTD – most of which has come since early March. Against the backdrop of the COVID-19 crisis, such a sharp earnings contraction is hardly a surprise. However, as we look a little further ahead, the 2021 EPS estimates for the market look heroic – implying that 2021 EPS will be 21% higher than 2019 EPS. This disconnect arguably poses the biggest risk to a sustained recovery in equity markets from current levels.

Share one of your new investments that you've made since the beginning of March and the reason for investing? Why are you excited about the company's future?

One of the more interesting newer positions in the portfolio is Booz Allen Hamilton – which is a U.S. based specialty IT services business. It almost exclusively services the U.S. government (i.e. Defence department, Intelligence agencies etc.) which effectively means they have far less earnings risk than the market as a whole.

The company’s recent results were very strong and it actually upgraded guidance when many companies are withdrawing guidance all together. Management expects to grow revenue by 6-10% and EPS by 10% this year. Historically it has grown sales and EPS by 7.2% and 17.5% p.a. respectively which is a very impressive effort.

From a research perspective, we have followed the name since 2012 and progressively built our thesis since then. Several members of the investment team have met with the company in recent years and we feel like we have a good understanding of the business and how it will perform.

As we look ahead, we feel the ability to deliver positive earnings growth in the current grim earnings environment really sets the company apart. Furthermore, the earnings environment seems to be actually improving as evidenced by a recent $800m / 5 year contract win. 

In terms of valuation, we don’t feel that the company is overly expensive on a 2021 P/E of 21x and Free Cash Flow yield of 5.0%. If we look out two years, we can see 35% upside from current levels. 

What metrics are considered in your investment research process? Could you use these metrics to apply a screen to your investable universe and come up with ~10 companies?

At a very high level, we look to screen for possible investment candidates based on a variety of profitability, growth and financial strength metrics. It’s only once we have formed our judgemental views on companies that pass our ‘Quality’ test do we look at them from a valuation perspective.

As far as the global small and mid cap equities space is concerned, we start by filtering for developed market companies with a market cap in excess of $1 billion (size) three consecutive years of 15% (profitability) and an Average Daily Traded Value in excess of $5m. As at the end of May, 460 companies pass this screen – which we feel represents a fairly deep and diverse starting point from which to invest.

Using this universe as a starting point, if we were to apply the following filters we would arrive at a group of 10 companies that arguably exhibit an excellent combination of profitability, growth, financial strength, liquidity and valuation support: 

1.   Return on Capital > 20%

2.   Net Debt / EBITDA < 2.5x

3.   Long Term EPS Growth > 5% p.a.

4.   Sales Growth (5yr historical) > 5% p.a.

5.   Operating Income Growth (5yr historical) > 5% p.a.

6.   Free Cash Flow Yield > 4% 

Of the ten names that pass our filters, we currently own Arista Networks, ICON Plc, Moncler and Partners Group.

Talk through a holding in your portfolio and compare it to its ASX equivalent? Why is the global name a more compelling opportunity?

We intentionally don’t look for ASX equivalents overseas as we feel the whole point of looking overseas is to find investment options that can’t easily be found domestically.

Having said that, we do feel that it’s instructive to look at the relative value proposition that can be found within the specialty health care field – more specifically, we would argue that there is a material scarcity value placed on the relatively limited universe in Australia when compared to the much more attractively valued global peers.

 

Relative value of Australian and Global health care companies

Australia

Market Cap (USD billions)

P/E Current

Return on Capital

Long term EPS Growth

Cochlear

$8.6

76.3x

33.6%

3.7%

CSL

$87.4

41.6x

22.5%

12.3%

Fisher and Paykel Health Care

$10.8

62.8x

22.9%

16.3%

Promedicus

$2.0

123.7x

45.3%

15.0%

Average

$27.2

76.1x

31.1%

11.8%

 

Global

Market Cap (USD billions)

P/E Current

Return on Capital

Long term EPS Growth

AmerisourceBergen

$19.4

12.1x

13.5%

12.2%

Cerner

$22.2

24.0x

10.0%

11.9%

Charles River Labs

$8.9

25.4x

8.4%

10.1%

ICON Plc

$8.8

28.0x

20.3%

8.2%

Mettler-Toledo

$19.0

36.1x

34.5%

8.2%

Average

$15.7

25.1x

17.3%

10.1%

 

As a comparable subset, we would argue that the global peers are materially more attractively valued than the Australian peers. While they aren’t exact like for likes, collectively they represent specialty health care names with comparable long term EPS growth outlooks – yet the global peers trade on a material discount to the Australian peers.

 

 

 

Important Information: This has been produced by Bell Asset Management Limited (BAM) ABN 84 092 278 647, AFSL 231091. This has been prepared by BAM for information purposes only and does not take into consideration the investment objectives, financial circumstances or needs of any particular recipient – it contains general information only. Before making any investment decision, you should consider your needs and objectives. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of any assumption contained herein. To the maximum extent permitted by law, none of BAM and its directors, employees or agents accepts any liability for any loss arising, including from negligence, from the use of this document or its contents. This document shall not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase or advice in relation to any securities. Any such offer shall only be made pursuant to an appropriate offer document. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of expected future performance.

Insights & Media

"A-rated" - 2020 UN PRI Assessment

Bell Asset Management: 2020 to be more volatile as reality of COVID-19 dawns on investors

Finding bargains in global small to mid-cap stocks

Sign up to our newsletter