
Sector Coverage
July 2026
Important Information:
This webinar contains information specifically intended for institutional clients, asset consultants, advisers, platforms and researchers, who are professional investors and wholesale clients (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001).
I confirm that I am a professional or wholesale investor as defined by the Corporations Act 2001 and wish to proceed.
Download PDF version here.
Over three weeks in late May and early June I attended four investor conferences across Europe and the US and held management meetings, attended fireside chats and conference presentations with more than 50 companies spanning technology and AI infrastructure, semiconductors and semiconductor capital equipment, software and internet, media and live entertainment, financials, electrical and power infrastructure, and public safety / defence technology.
The dominant topic of almost every technology meeting was artificial intelligence, but the conversation was more nuanced than a simple debate about which company is an AI winner. The key questions are now whether the pace of spending can be sustained, where the bottlenecks sit, which parts of the stack capture economic value, and which business models can convert demand into durable free cash flow. The most consistent signal was that the binding constraint is migrating down the stack, away from the GPU alone and towards power, memory, grid connection, advanced packaging and the physical plumbing of the data centre.
Outside AI, the trip reinforced the importance of dispersion. Consumer commentary was mixed but not uniformly weak (the famous K-shaped economy). Demand remains resilient where the value proposition is clear, the experience is distinctive or the use case is mission critical. By contrast, lower-quality or more discretionary businesses are being forced to rely more heavily on promotion, cost cutting or hope of macro relief.
The most actionable conclusion from the trip is therefore not simply to 'own AI', but to redirect the next stage of work towards the less crowded enablers where management commentary pointed to real bottlenecks and near-term earnings visibility. In addition to owned positions in Schneider Electric, Eaton Corp and Legrand SA, Prysmian and GE Vernova moved up the priority list because several meetings pointed to power availability, grid connection, cable supply, turbines and in-rack electrical architecture as more immediate constraints on data-centre growth (as much as accelerator demand itself).
Among existing tech holdings, ASML remains the highest-quality way to access the semiconductor layer after a reset in expectations, while ServiceNow deserves further debate on portfolio sizing. The ServiceNow meeting strengthened the case that its AI opportunity is not just a thematic overlay, and the company is monetising AI by embedding it in workflow automation across real enterprise processes, with customer outcomes measurable in productivity, service levels and cost savings. That makes AI more likely to deepen ServiceNow’s platform advantage than dilute it. Motorola Solutions was also a positive reiteration, with the meetings providing new evidence of an expanding total addressable market (TAM) in drone defence, resilient backlog, pricing power, mission-critical demand and rising AI-related content across command-centre and public-safety workflows.
Outside Technology, Media, and Telecommunications (TMT), Marex and Robinhood both caught our attention because both are platform businesses with clear value propositions and company-specific growth drivers. For example, Marex via clearing balances, agency and execution volumes, market-making opportunities and a broader institutional client base; Robinhood via net deposits, product velocity, AI-enabled operating leverage and optionality in prediction markets, tokenisation and international expansion.
The overall portfolio implication is to prioritise power infrastructure, mission-critical software and hardware, capital-markets and consumer-fintech infrastructure, and select monopoly-quality technology assets, while resisting the temptation to chase crowded AI-semiconductor multiple expansion.
The broadest single-name expression of the semicap process-complexity thesis, with direct exposure to leading-edge logic, DRAM / HBM, NAND and advanced packaging.
Action point: Initiated a position in early June.
World number one in cables, with an oligopolistic HVDC / submarine franchise and an approximately €17bn Transmission backlog that gives utility-grade revenue visibility.
Action point: Re-examine the fibre optics price ceiling. Likely a quality BUY on weakness.
A US consumer-fintech compounder, with a broadening multi-product ecosystem and genuine AI operating leverage.
Action point: Prioritise for deeper work and watch for an entry on volatility. Main risks are valuation, revenue cyclicality and take-rate compression.
UK-domiciled, Nasdaq-listed clearing, execution and market-infrastructure platform met; a potential capital-markets compounder with both cyclical and structural earnings drivers.
Action point: Add as a new idea and prioritise for deeper work. Build a normalised earnings bridge that separates rate / volatility tailwinds from structural share gains, stress-test clearing balances and client-default risk, assess acquisition discipline and compare valuation against exchanges, brokers and other capital-markets infrastructure peers.
This document has been prepared by Bell Asset Management Limited (BAM) and is provided on a confidential basis solely for information only purposes of selected “professional investors” (as the term is defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)) and investors in other jurisdictions which, if they were located in Australia, would qualify as professional investors.
The distribution of this document may be restricted by local laws in certain jurisdictions and BAM accepts no responsibility for recipients of this document in those jurisdictions – recipients in those jurisdictions should inform themselves as to the requirements of, and observe accordingly, local laws. To the maximum extent permitted by law, none of BAM and its directors, employees or agents accepts any liability for any loss arising, including from negligence, from the use of this document or its contents nor does BAM assume any obligation to update the information. Recipients of this document agree to maintain the document confidential and to only use it to evaluate a potential investment in a BAM product or strategy. Recipients of this document also agree not to share this document in whole or in part with any person who is not a professional investor.
This document may contain forward looking statements and such statements are made based on information BAM holds as reliable; however, no guarantee is given that such forward looking statements will be achieved. BAM has made every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of the information contained in this document; however, no warranty is given as to the accuracy or reliability of the information.
Information about specific investments is included for illustrative purposes, in order to assist prospective investors in better understanding the investment strategies and processes used by BAM, and is not intended to be indicative of actual future investments or performance results that will be achieved in the future. There is no assurance that similar investment opportunities will be available in the future, and the results of actual investments in the future may differ significantly.
Important Information:
This video contains information specifically intended for institutional clients, asset consultants, advisers, platforms and researchers, who are professional investors and wholesale clients (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001).
I confirm that I am a professional or wholesale investor as defined by the Corporations Act 2001 and wish to proceed.
Download PDF version here.
Over three weeks in late May and early June I attended four investor conferences across Europe and the US and held management meetings, attended fireside chats and conference presentations with more than 50 companies spanning technology and AI infrastructure, semiconductors and semiconductor capital equipment, software and internet, media and live entertainment, financials, electrical and power infrastructure, and public safety / defence technology.
The dominant topic of almost every technology meeting was artificial intelligence, but the conversation was more nuanced than a simple debate about which company is an AI winner. The key questions are now whether the pace of spending can be sustained, where the bottlenecks sit, which parts of the stack capture economic value, and which business models can convert demand into durable free cash flow. The most consistent signal was that the binding constraint is migrating down the stack, away from the GPU alone and towards power, memory, grid connection, advanced packaging and the physical plumbing of the data centre.
Outside AI, the trip reinforced the importance of dispersion. Consumer commentary was mixed but not uniformly weak (the famous K-shaped economy). Demand remains resilient where the value proposition is clear, the experience is distinctive or the use case is mission critical. By contrast, lower-quality or more discretionary businesses are being forced to rely more heavily on promotion, cost cutting or hope of macro relief.
The most actionable conclusion from the trip is therefore not simply to 'own AI', but to redirect the next stage of work towards the less crowded enablers where management commentary pointed to real bottlenecks and near-term earnings visibility. In addition to owned positions in Schneider Electric, Eaton Corp and Legrand SA, Prysmian and GE Vernova moved up the priority list because several meetings pointed to power availability, grid connection, cable supply, turbines and in-rack electrical architecture as more immediate constraints on data-centre growth (as much as accelerator demand itself).
Among existing tech holdings, ASML remains the highest-quality way to access the semiconductor layer after a reset in expectations, while ServiceNow deserves further debate on portfolio sizing. The ServiceNow meeting strengthened the case that its AI opportunity is not just a thematic overlay, and the company is monetising AI by embedding it in workflow automation across real enterprise processes, with customer outcomes measurable in productivity, service levels and cost savings. That makes AI more likely to deepen ServiceNow’s platform advantage than dilute it. Motorola Solutions was also a positive reiteration, with the meetings providing new evidence of an expanding total addressable market (TAM) in drone defence, resilient backlog, pricing power, mission-critical demand and rising AI-related content across command-centre and public-safety workflows.
Outside Technology, Media, and Telecommunications (TMT), Marex and Robinhood both caught our attention because both are platform businesses with clear value propositions and company-specific growth drivers. For example, Marex via clearing balances, agency and execution volumes, market-making opportunities and a broader institutional client base; Robinhood via net deposits, product velocity, AI-enabled operating leverage and optionality in prediction markets, tokenisation and international expansion.
The overall portfolio implication is to prioritise power infrastructure, mission-critical software and hardware, capital-markets and consumer-fintech infrastructure, and select monopoly-quality technology assets, while resisting the temptation to chase crowded AI-semiconductor multiple expansion.
The broadest single-name expression of the semicap process-complexity thesis, with direct exposure to leading-edge logic, DRAM / HBM, NAND and advanced packaging.
Action point: Initiated a position in early June.
World number one in cables, with an oligopolistic HVDC / submarine franchise and an approximately €17bn Transmission backlog that gives utility-grade revenue visibility.
Action point: Re-examine the fibre optics price ceiling. Likely a quality BUY on weakness.
A US consumer-fintech compounder, with a broadening multi-product ecosystem and genuine AI operating leverage.
Action point: Prioritise for deeper work and watch for an entry on volatility. Main risks are valuation, revenue cyclicality and take-rate compression.
UK-domiciled, Nasdaq-listed clearing, execution and market-infrastructure platform met; a potential capital-markets compounder with both cyclical and structural earnings drivers.
Action point: Add as a new idea and prioritise for deeper work. Build a normalised earnings bridge that separates rate / volatility tailwinds from structural share gains, stress-test clearing balances and client-default risk, assess acquisition discipline and compare valuation against exchanges, brokers and other capital-markets infrastructure peers.
This document has been prepared by Bell Asset Management Limited (BAM) and is provided on a confidential basis solely for information only purposes of selected “professional investors” (as the term is defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)) and investors in other jurisdictions which, if they were located in Australia, would qualify as professional investors.
The distribution of this document may be restricted by local laws in certain jurisdictions and BAM accepts no responsibility for recipients of this document in those jurisdictions – recipients in those jurisdictions should inform themselves as to the requirements of, and observe accordingly, local laws. To the maximum extent permitted by law, none of BAM and its directors, employees or agents accepts any liability for any loss arising, including from negligence, from the use of this document or its contents nor does BAM assume any obligation to update the information. Recipients of this document agree to maintain the document confidential and to only use it to evaluate a potential investment in a BAM product or strategy. Recipients of this document also agree not to share this document in whole or in part with any person who is not a professional investor.
This document may contain forward looking statements and such statements are made based on information BAM holds as reliable; however, no guarantee is given that such forward looking statements will be achieved. BAM has made every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of the information contained in this document; however, no warranty is given as to the accuracy or reliability of the information.
Information about specific investments is included for illustrative purposes, in order to assist prospective investors in better understanding the investment strategies and processes used by BAM, and is not intended to be indicative of actual future investments or performance results that will be achieved in the future. There is no assurance that similar investment opportunities will be available in the future, and the results of actual investments in the future may differ significantly.
Download PDF version here.
Over three weeks in late May and early June I attended four investor conferences across Europe and the US and held management meetings, attended fireside chats and conference presentations with more than 50 companies spanning technology and AI infrastructure, semiconductors and semiconductor capital equipment, software and internet, media and live entertainment, financials, electrical and power infrastructure, and public safety / defence technology.
The dominant topic of almost every technology meeting was artificial intelligence, but the conversation was more nuanced than a simple debate about which company is an AI winner. The key questions are now whether the pace of spending can be sustained, where the bottlenecks sit, which parts of the stack capture economic value, and which business models can convert demand into durable free cash flow. The most consistent signal was that the binding constraint is migrating down the stack, away from the GPU alone and towards power, memory, grid connection, advanced packaging and the physical plumbing of the data centre.
Outside AI, the trip reinforced the importance of dispersion. Consumer commentary was mixed but not uniformly weak (the famous K-shaped economy). Demand remains resilient where the value proposition is clear, the experience is distinctive or the use case is mission critical. By contrast, lower-quality or more discretionary businesses are being forced to rely more heavily on promotion, cost cutting or hope of macro relief.
The most actionable conclusion from the trip is therefore not simply to 'own AI', but to redirect the next stage of work towards the less crowded enablers where management commentary pointed to real bottlenecks and near-term earnings visibility. In addition to owned positions in Schneider Electric, Eaton Corp and Legrand SA, Prysmian and GE Vernova moved up the priority list because several meetings pointed to power availability, grid connection, cable supply, turbines and in-rack electrical architecture as more immediate constraints on data-centre growth (as much as accelerator demand itself).
Among existing tech holdings, ASML remains the highest-quality way to access the semiconductor layer after a reset in expectations, while ServiceNow deserves further debate on portfolio sizing. The ServiceNow meeting strengthened the case that its AI opportunity is not just a thematic overlay, and the company is monetising AI by embedding it in workflow automation across real enterprise processes, with customer outcomes measurable in productivity, service levels and cost savings. That makes AI more likely to deepen ServiceNow’s platform advantage than dilute it. Motorola Solutions was also a positive reiteration, with the meetings providing new evidence of an expanding total addressable market (TAM) in drone defence, resilient backlog, pricing power, mission-critical demand and rising AI-related content across command-centre and public-safety workflows.
Outside Technology, Media, and Telecommunications (TMT), Marex and Robinhood both caught our attention because both are platform businesses with clear value propositions and company-specific growth drivers. For example, Marex via clearing balances, agency and execution volumes, market-making opportunities and a broader institutional client base; Robinhood via net deposits, product velocity, AI-enabled operating leverage and optionality in prediction markets, tokenisation and international expansion.
The overall portfolio implication is to prioritise power infrastructure, mission-critical software and hardware, capital-markets and consumer-fintech infrastructure, and select monopoly-quality technology assets, while resisting the temptation to chase crowded AI-semiconductor multiple expansion.
The broadest single-name expression of the semicap process-complexity thesis, with direct exposure to leading-edge logic, DRAM / HBM, NAND and advanced packaging.
Action point: Initiated a position in early June.
World number one in cables, with an oligopolistic HVDC / submarine franchise and an approximately €17bn Transmission backlog that gives utility-grade revenue visibility.
Action point: Re-examine the fibre optics price ceiling. Likely a quality BUY on weakness.
A US consumer-fintech compounder, with a broadening multi-product ecosystem and genuine AI operating leverage.
Action point: Prioritise for deeper work and watch for an entry on volatility. Main risks are valuation, revenue cyclicality and take-rate compression.
UK-domiciled, Nasdaq-listed clearing, execution and market-infrastructure platform met; a potential capital-markets compounder with both cyclical and structural earnings drivers.
Action point: Add as a new idea and prioritise for deeper work. Build a normalised earnings bridge that separates rate / volatility tailwinds from structural share gains, stress-test clearing balances and client-default risk, assess acquisition discipline and compare valuation against exchanges, brokers and other capital-markets infrastructure peers.
This document has been prepared by Bell Asset Management Limited (BAM) and is provided on a confidential basis solely for information only purposes of selected “professional investors” (as the term is defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)) and investors in other jurisdictions which, if they were located in Australia, would qualify as professional investors.
The distribution of this document may be restricted by local laws in certain jurisdictions and BAM accepts no responsibility for recipients of this document in those jurisdictions – recipients in those jurisdictions should inform themselves as to the requirements of, and observe accordingly, local laws. To the maximum extent permitted by law, none of BAM and its directors, employees or agents accepts any liability for any loss arising, including from negligence, from the use of this document or its contents nor does BAM assume any obligation to update the information. Recipients of this document agree to maintain the document confidential and to only use it to evaluate a potential investment in a BAM product or strategy. Recipients of this document also agree not to share this document in whole or in part with any person who is not a professional investor.
This document may contain forward looking statements and such statements are made based on information BAM holds as reliable; however, no guarantee is given that such forward looking statements will be achieved. BAM has made every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of the information contained in this document; however, no warranty is given as to the accuracy or reliability of the information.
Information about specific investments is included for illustrative purposes, in order to assist prospective investors in better understanding the investment strategies and processes used by BAM, and is not intended to be indicative of actual future investments or performance results that will be achieved in the future. There is no assurance that similar investment opportunities will be available in the future, and the results of actual investments in the future may differ significantly.